Did the weakest Dem candidate for the general election won tonight? I think so. By sending forth Hussein Osama out of Iowa, Democrats have unwittingly weakened their general election prospects.
Hussein’s exotic mixture of radical liberalism, Kwanzaa Socialism, antipathy towards the unborn, and weakness against his jihadi brethren will all come back to destroy him against almost any Republican opponent, even the snake-grope from Hope.
I think we as Republicans should be celebrating tonight at the coronation of Hussein, in whose presence millions of Democrat women, from elementary school teachers to journalism majors to law school grads to dykes on bikes will go weak in their knees.
As defenders of this great Republic, and of the pinnacle of Western civilization that it represents, we should all come together tonight and agree on a common strategy that will keep the White House from becoming a madrassa.
God Bless America, Land of the Free.
Shall we examin the above for truth content?
Does the use of "Hussein Osama" confuse any issues?
Is Obama really a "radical liberal"?
What is "Kwanzaa Socialism"?
"Dykes on bikes"?
"Madrassa"? Hasn't that been debunked any number of times?
Where are the facts that support the accusations and innuendos? There are none. I get a lot of e-mail; left, right and center but I don't believe I've seen another such blast of fact-free hot air.
Anyone want to defend the tactic?
Expect more e-mail slime from the the Free Republic. They claim to represent Republicans - those folks on the right who are so full of moral indignation. I guess their morality doesn't extend to truth.